Why “More Donors” Isn’t Always the Answer

A case for retention, relationships, and right-fit growth

We need to value donors as much as we need value from them.
— Reinier Spruit

When fundraising results stall, there’s a familiar instinct at many organizations—especially at the executive level:

We need more donors.

More names.
More volume.
More activity.

It sounds logical. But for many nonprofits, this way of thinking quietly makes fundraising harder—not easier.

Because fundraising strain is rarely caused by having too few donors.
It’s usually caused by asking too much of systems that aren’t built to support relationships at scale.

Volume Thinking vs. Relationship Reality

Volume thinking assumes that growth is mostly a math problem:

  • More donors in

  • More dollars out

But fundraising doesn’t actually work that way.

Every donor represents a relationship:

  • Someone who needs to be welcomed

  • Thanked well and on time

  • Communicated with consistently

  • Remembered and followed up with thoughtfully

If your organization struggles to do those things now, adding more donors doesn’t fix the problem. It amplifies it.

What Often Gets Missed

When leaders push for donor growth without addressing infrastructure, fundraisers are left managing:

  • Low retention
    New donors come in the door—and quietly leave a year later.

  • Shallow relationships
    Communications become generic because personalization takes time and system support.

  • Burnout risk
    Fundraisers carry the emotional and administrative weight of “more” without more capacity.

The result?
A constantly refilled leaky bucket—and a team that never feels caught up.

Retention Is a Growth Strategy

Here’s the reframe many organizations need:

Keeping donors is growth.
Deepening relationships is growth.

Retaining donors:

  • Costs less than acquisition

  • Produces more predictable revenue

  • Builds trust that compounds over time

Yet it’s often deprioritized because it doesn’t look as busy or exciting as acquisition campaigns.

That’s a mistake.

Right-Fit Growth Beats More Growth

This doesn’t mean organizations should never seek new donors. It means growth should be intentional and right-fit, not reflexive.

Right-fit growth asks:

  • Do we have the systems to steward new donors well?

  • Are we clear on who our best donors actually are?

  • Are we growing relationships—or just lists?

Sometimes the most strategic move isn’t adding names.
It’s strengthening the experience of the donors who already care.

Systems Make Relationships Possible

Strong retention doesn’t happen because fundraisers “try harder.” It happens because systems support the work:

  • Clear donor tracking and notes

  • Simple, realistic communication calendars

  • Shared ownership of stewardship tasks

  • Easy access to core content and talking points

These systems don’t just improve results.
They reduce stress, stabilize teams, and make fundraising feel humane again.

A Better Question for Leaders

Instead of asking:

“How do we get more donors?”

Try asking:

“What would make it easier to keep and care for the donors we already have?”

That question leads to better decisions—for revenue and for the people doing the work.

Because sustainable fundraising isn’t built on volume alone.
It’s built on relationships your organization can actually support.

Previous
Previous

Are Your Events Serving Your Fundraising—or Draining It?

Next
Next

The Fundraising Systems That Reduce Stress All Year Long